← All articles
When I trained as a mindfulness teacher, my own participants wanted their course content on their phone, the device they had with them all day. No fit-for-purpose platform existed to digitalise an evidence-based programme without compromising its integrity, so I built one. A company reached out recently asking about a wellbeing hub for its employees. They had plenty of internal material. What they lacked was a proper system to put it in front of people so they would actually use it. Same problem, from one teacher to a company of thousands. Nobody has it sorted.
Personal resilience matters, and the demands of life and work are not getting easier. That is what keeps me building this. I do not deliver the programmes that build resilience. The practitioners do. My contribution is a platform that takes their existing teaching and puts it on a phone, without them having to learn to code or hire a developer.
An access problem
The substantive problem is not that there is too little material. There is plenty. Practitioners build it up over years of teaching. Organisations accumulate it across HR, learning, occupational health, employee assistance programmes. The problem is that the material sits in places people do not go and in formats that are awkward to use. What looks like a content problem is an access problem.
The constraint on top of this is cost. Wellbeing budgets get scrutinised like every other line item. From a business case perspective, it is genuinely difficult to say how much is enough. So whatever the answer to the access problem looks like, it has to work at a price a practitioner can afford from their own income, and that an organisation can defend on the same business case as anything else.
Container, not creator
What the platform is, at its simplest, is a place to put someone else's programme. Dr Carter Lebares' Enhanced Stress Resilience Training is the longest-running example on it. She built ESRT over years of working with surgeons in high-stress clinical settings. The platform is what gets it onto the phones of the people who go through it. The same shape works for a single practitioner with a course they have refined over a career, and for an organisation with internal wellbeing material it cannot get in front of its workforce.
Different doors in
The platform offers six ways into the same material. Reading, for the teaching points that read best on the page. Video, for material that needs to be seen. Audio, mostly for practices and guided exercises. A chatbot trained on the course content, for those who would rather talk through what they are learning than read about it. A journal, for putting experience into words. And a community space, for learning from others on the same programme.
The point is not to be prescriptive about how someone engages. Different people reach for different parts of the same programme. One participant in the early Mindful Brian research at Bangor said the reflection and journal was the part she used. Putting experience into words was where the practice happened for her. Another said the thing that made her practice was simply having the audio on her phone, with her, wherever she went. Same programme, different ways in.
The platform also gives the practitioner a clear view of where the programme is landing for the people in it. What is connecting, what is being skipped, where someone might need extra support.
What keeps it lean
The platform was created eight years ago and rebuilt last year. The rebuild matters because the cost of running it now is a fraction of what it was. That is what makes the practitioner price defensible. AI is increasingly the teammate for the work that would otherwise need a team. The website, the app, the brand assets, much of the operations. The detail is for a future article.
BeWell IT is for-profit, but not venture-backed. The model is sustainability, not scale at any cost. The platform is built from inside the practitioner community, for that community.
If you have a programme that needs a better way to reach the people you teach, bewellit.com is the place to start. The bigger point is that more people get reached when many practitioners can scale their own programmes than when any one person tries to scale theirs. That is the bet the platform is built on.